From: | Jean-Luc Lachance <jllachan(at)nsd(dot)ca> |
---|---|
To: | Brian Avis <brian(dot)avis(at)searhc(dot)org> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Listing Numbers |
Date: | 2002-03-04 22:56:26 |
Message-ID: | 3C83FB9A.48D7B0A1@nsd.ca |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Brian,
If it is for the purpose of finding a free entry, it would be more
practical to have all possible records (1-9999) exist in the table and
simply flag them as valid or used or free (as you prefer). Then finding
the first available is as simple as:
SELECT MIN(n) FROM list WHERE free;
or
SELECT n FORM list WHERE free LIMIT 1;
If you insist in geting the list of unused:
Create a single column table t19999 with with row 1 to 9999.
Then:
SELECT n FROM t19999 WHERE NOT EXISTS( SELECT n FROM list WHERE list.n =
t19999.n);
JLL
Brian Avis wrote:
>
> If I have a column with a list of numbers between 1 and 9999 is there a
> way to select all the numbers in that range that have not been used?
>
> For example lets say the list is 1 - 10 instead, and looked like this.
>
> 1
> 2
> 3
> 5
> 7
> 9
> 10
>
> I want the database to return
>
> 4
> 6
> 8
>
> Any hints or ideas?
>
> --
> Brian Avis
> SEARHC Medical Clinic
> Juneau, AK 99801
> (907) 463-4049
> cd /pub
> more beer
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-03-04 23:01:27 | Re: trying to upgrade and keep large object IDs intact... |
Previous Message | Patrick L. Nolan | 2002-03-04 22:51:53 | What are functional indices good for? |