From: | Konrad Scherer <kscherer(at)magma(dot)ca> |
---|---|
To: | |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Wierdness using SUM to add results of custom C function. |
Date: | 2002-02-25 18:37:32 |
Message-ID: | 3C7A846C.CBF95D38@magma.ca |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Konrad Scherer <kscherer(at)magma(dot)ca> writes:
> > The C function returns the correct result all the time but the sum
> > returns the wrong result all the time. It mostly returns 23, but it
> > returned 24 once!
>
> Very strange. May we see the full text of the C function, and the
> SQL declaration you gave for it?
I was hoping someone would just say "Yeah I had that bug. Upgrade to .."
;-)
Here is everything you need to reproduce this.
C function
#include
"postgres.h"
#include
"executor/spi.h"
int countwords(text
*txt);
//this function counts the number of commas in a comma seperated
list
//and then deduces the number of words in the list
int countwords(text *txt)
{
int i,
count;
char *
str;
//retrieve string from text
field
str = DatumGetCString(DirectFunctionCall1(textout,
PointerGetDatum(txt)));
//if no text, then no
words
if (txt->vl_len < 1)
{
return
0;
}
//if there is text, but no commas there must be one
word
count =
1;
//ignore commas in first and last postion in
list
for (i=1;i<(txt->vl_len)-1;i++)
{
if (str[i]==',')
{
count++;
}
}
return
count;
}
An aside: should I be freeing str after I am done with it? It looks like
it is only returning a pointer into the field.
Compiled on Solaris using
gcc -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -fPIC
-I/export/home/kscherer/postgresql-7.1.3/src/interfaces/libpq
-I/export/home/kscherer/postgresql-7.1.3/src/include -c -o
countWords.o countWords.c
/usr/ccs/bin/ld -G -Bdynamic -o countWords.so countWords.o
A quick script to run
drop function countWords(text);
CREATE FUNCTION countwords(text)
RETURNS int
AS '/export/home/kscherer/src/countWords.so'
LANGUAGE 'C';
DROP table "sumtest";
CREATE table "sumtest" (
headwords text );
INSERT into sumtest values (
'abattage/nm , abat/nm , abats/npl , abattis/npl , abattoir/nm ,
abatteuse/nf
, abattant/nm , abat-son/nm , abat-foin/nm , abat-feuille/nm ,
abattable/adj , abat-voix/nm , abat-jour/nm , abatteur/nm ,
abat-vent/nm , abattu/adj , abattement/nm , s\'abattre/vp');
INSERT into sumtest values (
'abate.vt, abate.vi, abatement.n');
INSERT into sumtest values ('abattoir/n');
select countwords(headwords) from sumtest;
select sum(countwords(headwords)) from sumtest;
Gives output (repeatedly) on my machine as follows
countwords
------------
18
3
1
(3 rows)
sum
-----
23
(1
row)
You can quickly verify that 18,3,1 are indeed the correct answers and
that 23 is the worng one.
It may have something to do with the parameter passing of the int in the
C function, but then why does it work without using sum??
Thank You in advance
Konrad Scherer
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Eric Webber | 2002-02-25 18:41:03 | LXP, APACHE auth_module with html form, & mod_auth_pg questions |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-02-25 18:02:56 | Re: A minor bug and a complaint |