Re: elog() proposal

From: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: elog() proposal
Date: 2002-02-23 16:53:04
Message-ID: 3C77C8F0.15737F6F@fourpalms.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

...
> > 2. CRASH doesn't seem like a good name to me.
> Why not? It's short, memorable, accurate, and what's wrong with
> a little levity?

Because you'd have to be, uh, us to see humor in that message when your
system is not behaving :)

I'm with Peter on this one; let's find another more neutral name.

- Tom

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-02-23 16:53:24 Re: Storage Location Patch Proposal for V7.3
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-02-23 16:41:11 Re: elog() proposal