| From: | Colin Faber <cfaber(at)fpsn(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL 8.0 ?? |
| Date: | 2002-02-21 15:38:20 |
| Message-ID: | 3C75146C.2D55247F@fpsn.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Personally, I have to agree with Tom,
Silly versioning like that is for marketing teams and microsoft ;-)
<sarcasm>How about the next version be released as PostgreSQL
XP</sarcasm>
Tom Lane wrote:
>
> "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> > Doesn't this seem like postgresql 8.0, rather than 7.3?
>
> It took us five years to go from 6.0 to 7.0 ... I don't think we
> need talk about 8.0 for awhile yet.
>
> I'm not in favor of arbitrary "release number inflation". A release
> is a release, whatever you call it.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
--
Colin Faber
(303) 859-1491
fpsn.net, Inc.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Justin Clift | 2002-02-21 15:47:56 | Re: PostgreSQL 8.0 ?? |
| Previous Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2002-02-21 15:22:31 | Re: Trouble with pg_dumpall import with 7.2 |