Re: Hierarchical Queries--Stalled No Longer...

Josh,
Thanks man, good to know.

Sorry if the question was a bit out of place on this list
but I wanted to make sure I reached the right people.

I love what you guys are doing and made sure postgresql
was included in my book.

also, while I got your ear. I bugged Simon about this
earlier this year and was wondering if you guys are still
planning on added the window functions added to the '03 standard?

I have a ton of recipes that use them and if you guys are still
planning on implementing them, I'd like to mention that as well.

Thanks,
Anthony

-----Original Message-----
From: Josh Berkus [mailto:josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com]
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2005 2:43 PM
To: Anthony Molinaro
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Hierarchical Queries--Stalled No Longer...

Anthony,

> So is postgresql going into the direction of WITH or CONNECT BY (or
> both)?

PostgreSQL would do ONLY "with". We're not interested in
Oracle-proprietary syntax.

That being said, there is a CONNECT_BY() function in /contrib/tablefunc.

But this would never be part of the core syntax.

> I am authoring O'Reilly's "SQL Cookbook" and I'd like to mention it in
> the
> Hierarchical chapter to give the pg readers a heads up.

Keen. Please feel free to ask questions so that the PG section can be
as
accurate as possible. #postgresql on irc.freenode.net is quite active,
and you can get any number of Postgres - SQL questions answered there.

--Josh

--
__Aglio Database Solutions_______________
Josh Berkus Consultant
josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com www.agliodbs.com
Ph: 415-752-2500 Fax: 415-752-2387
2166 Hayes Suite 200 San Francisco, CA