From: | Barry Lind <barry(at)xythos(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Dave(at)micro-automation(dot)net |
Cc: | "'Tom Lane'" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "'Marc G(dot) Fournier'" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org, ryan(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: JDBC split and move ... |
Date: | 2002-02-11 04:30:52 |
Message-ID: | 3C6748FC.2010108@xythos.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
Dave Cramer wrote:
>
> I have to agree with Tom here, I don't see anything wrong with the way
> things are now, except that we would like to release more often.
>
> I would vote for a separate release schedule
>
We could have a more frequent release cycle today for jdbc if we wanted.
There is nothing preventing us from creating a branch for a jdbc
release to be done between 7.2 and 7.3. But as I have stated in a
previous mail note, there are generally dependences between jdbc and the
backend that will likely require at a minimum a new jdbc release for
each backend release.
Also what happens when we get to the point where we have a java
procedural language in the server? Then the line that appears very
clear between backend and jdbc code gets very blurred. (fyi, this is
something that I know two different people are working on and might get
done in the 7.3 timeframe).
thanks,
--Barry
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-02-11 05:14:09 | Re: JDBC split and move ... |
Previous Message | Barry Lind | 2002-02-11 04:23:00 | Re: JDBC split and move ... |