| From: | Haroldo Stenger <hstenger(at)adinet(dot)com(dot)uy> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dann Corbit <DCorbit(at)connx(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Threaded PosgreSQL server |
| Date: | 2002-02-05 18:25:13 |
| Message-ID: | 3C602389.45AADA2A@adinet.com.uy |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Dann Corbit wrote:
>
> Are there any plans to merge the sources from the experimental threaded
> server and the forked server so that a compile switch could choose the
> model?
Just a question, in order to elighten my thought. Does the current experimental
threaded server disable multi-process model? Or does it *add* the functionality
as a compile switch? (This would be the other way round as the one you pointed
out.)
I think it is important as to evaluate resistance to go multithreading.
If they disabled the original method, I agree with Tom. If they *merged* both
flawlessly, I would try to consider it for the current tree.
Any comments?
Regards,
Haroldo.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Meskes | 2002-02-05 18:29:26 | Re: Management tool support and scalibility |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-02-05 18:24:03 | Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL v7.2 Final Release |