From: | Chris Humphries <chumphries(at)devis(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: TODO question and claim |
Date: | 2002-01-22 16:53:43 |
Message-ID: | 3C4D9917.6060303@devis.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
sorry, i misunderstood what he said. since maxbackends is global,
would like something that isnt global, like relative to a db. here
is his messages:
--snip--
<DarcyB> maxbackends is GLOBAL, not specific to a DB and/or
Authentication methood
<DarcyB> For example if you have a postgresinstall, with a maxbackends of 64
<chrish> authentication method?
<DarcyB> but that postmaster has 3 DB's in it.. (accounting, crm, demo)
<DarcyB> and you want to allow 32 connections to accounting 24 to crm
and 8 to demo
<DarcyB> ....
<chrish> right, makes sence
<DarcyB> as per auth methood, I want to allow only 2 "remote"
connections via SSL, and 16 via straight unix domain and 14 via
standatd TCP
--snip--
sorry for the communication error.
-chris
Tom Lane wrote:
> Chris Humphries <chumphries(at)devis(dot)com> writes:
>
>> First i would like to start off by coding a feature that DarcyB,
>> nick from IRC, suggested as a starting point for me. A max connections
>> settable limit.
>>
>
> Uh, how is that different from MaxBackends?
>
> regards, tom lane
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Keith G. Murphy | 2002-01-22 17:29:10 | Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-01-22 16:51:30 | Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects |