Re: again on index usage

From: Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Daniel Kalchev <daniel(at)digsys(dot)bg>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: again on index usage
Date: 2002-01-11 19:29:32
Message-ID: 3C3F3D1C.6040307@pacifier.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian wrote:

>
> I have always felt some feedback mechanism from the executor back to the
> optimizer was required but I was never sure quite how to implement it.

The folks at DEC (rdb???) wrote a paper on it a long time ago (duh, back
when DEC existed). I ran across it in the Tuft's library about a year
ago, back when my girlfriend was in grad school.

--
Don Baccus
Portland, OR
http://donb.photo.net, http://birdnotes.net, http://openacs.org

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Don Baccus 2002-01-11 19:42:38 Re: again on index usage
Previous Message Martin Renters 2002-01-11 19:10:46 bug in permission handling?