| From: | Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee> |
|---|---|
| To: | jussi(dot)mikkola(at)bonware(dot)com |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: 7.2 is slow? |
| Date: | 2002-01-09 10:02:42 |
| Message-ID: | 3C3C1542.DF349C6C@tm.ee |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Jussi Mikkola wrote:
>
> Hi Tom!
>
> Well, here's the profile, but yes, almost all the times are zero. Both without
> the patch, and with it. Did I miss something? (Yes, I did make and install
> afterwards ;-)
>
> I made a new database, so as it was growing, the times were even slower than
> before. (It would be nice, if I could create a large database from the
> beginning.;)
>
> Is this of any help? Do you need the same result with less cpus?
>
> Jussi
>
> Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > Jussi Mikkola <jussi(dot)mikkola(at)bonware(dot)com> writes:
> > > Yes, now I've tested with 7.2b4. The result is about the same as with 7.1.
> >
> > > About 200 messages with four processors and about 600 messages with one
> > > processor.
> >
Was this solved with latest LWLock patches ?
--------------
Hannu
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Hannu Krosing | 2002-01-09 10:03:06 | Re: 7.1 vs. 7.2 on AIX 5L |
| Previous Message | Hiroshi Inoue | 2002-01-09 09:45:22 | Re: again on index usage |