From: | Dave Trombley <dtrom(at)bumba(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | "Roderick A(dot) Anderson" <raanders(at)tincan(dot)org> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: sequential scans and the like operator |
Date: | 2002-01-08 19:05:54 |
Message-ID: | 3C3B4312.5020805@bumba.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Roderick A. Anderson wrote:
>There is a discussion going on on the sql-ledger mailing list concerning
>whether indexes will provide any performance improvements. The one that
>caught my eye was whether using LIKE in a statement would force a
>sequential scan.
>
You can always check exaclty what's being done in your queries by
using the EXPLAIN command. For example, to test your hypothesis:
------------------
test=# create table foo(f text, i int);
CREATE
test=# create index foo_t on foo (f);
CREATE
test=# explain select * from foo where f like '%uiop%';
NOTICE: QUERY PLAN:
Seq Scan on foo (cost=0.00..22.50 rows=1 width=36)
EXPLAIN
test=# explain select * from foo where f = '%uiop%';
NOTICE: QUERY PLAN:
Index Scan using foo_t on foo (cost=0.00..17.07 rows=5 width=36)
EXPLAIN
---------------------
-dj trombley
<dtrom(at)bumba(dot)net>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | SHELTON,MICHAEL (Non-HP-Boise,ex1) | 2002-01-08 19:25:12 | Re: How to Install PostgreSQL on Windows 2000 |
Previous Message | Dave Trombley | 2002-01-08 19:01:51 | Re: JDO implementation? |