From: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Permaine Cheung <pcheung(at)redhat(dot)com>, Vince Vielhaber <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com> |
Cc: | thomas(at)pgsql(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Third call for platform testing |
Date: | 2001-12-13 14:54:15 |
Message-ID: | 3C18C117.B0496A8C@fourpalms.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> > For PS/2, how does the CPU identify itself? If you have to remove the
> > slock_t definition from the port include file then presumably it does
> > identify itself as one of the already supported CPUs (alpha, arm, ia64,
> > i386, mips, ppc, sparc, s390), right? Or does some other default setting
> > get used that you then #undef in that include file?
> I specified --template=linux. :)
And it is an x86 CPU?
> > A few more details would probably let someone reproduce your result,
> > which would be enough to consider this as a supported platform. That is,
> > as long as you aren't running the only PlayStation 2 in the world with
> > Linux?? Heck, on second thought we'd consider it supported even so ;)
> I'm trying to submit the report, however, I've been getting a
> PostgreSQL query failure saying regresstests does not exist in
> /usr/local/www/developer/regress/regress.php.
Yeah, something apparently broke on the server. Vince?
In the meantime, you can post those results to this mailing list (or to
the -ports mailing list).
- Thomas
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2001-12-13 14:55:13 | Re: Third call for platform testing |
Previous Message | Dave Page | 2001-12-13 14:21:08 | Re: [HACKERS] Platform Testing - Cygwin |