Re: ODBC functions in gram.y

From: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Hackers List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ODBC functions in gram.y
Date: 2001-12-11 14:41:46
Message-ID: 3C161B2A.F409BF18@fourpalms.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> As long as it works, more power to you. ;)

OK. btw, can you recall the use case for the CURRENT_xxx() syntax (with
parens)? ODBC officially defines synonyms for these functions which were
already supported by the driver. So some other application was
generating these function calls?

> Btw., the odbc.sql file still has some doubled-up lines from your
> interrupted commit.

Thanks. I'm fixing it now (but may have to wait a bit to get it
committed; the DSL line is still trouble).

- Thomas

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Lockhart 2001-12-11 14:49:49 Re: New Port targetting NetWare
Previous Message mlw 2001-12-11 12:13:36 Re: Explicit configuration file