| From: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Hackers List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Third call for platform testing |
| Date: | 2001-12-10 16:30:52 |
| Message-ID: | 3C14E33C.5E694885@fourpalms.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
...
> Please note that QNX 4 and QNX 6 are completely different operating
> systems that happen to come from the same company. So you don't want to
> have one entry for both of them.
Oh, of course. Don't know why one would assume that they are versions of
the *same* OS ;)
From recent emails, it looks like QNX 4 should be listed as supported,
and QNX 6 could/should be listed as "supported with patches". Or should
the status for 6 be something different?
- Thomas
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2001-12-10 16:33:27 | Re: ODBC functions in gram.y |
| Previous Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2001-12-10 16:24:25 | Re: Explicit configuration file |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Manuel Sugawara | 2001-12-10 17:01:42 | Re: date formatting and tab-complete patch |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2001-12-10 15:34:40 | Re: [HACKERS] date formatting and tab-complete patch |