Re: Call for platform testing

From: Luis Amigo <lamigo(at)atc(dot)unican(dot)es>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers Mailing List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Call for platform testing
Date: 2001-12-03 08:53:19
Message-ID: 3C0B3D7E.BCDFDEE7@atc.unican.es
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut wrote:

> Luis Amigo writes:
>
> > I still believe this difference is made by FPUs
> > config.guess only says mips-sgi-irix6.5
>
> If your uname -m gives any clue about the processor type we might want to
> create a patch for config.guess.
>
> --
> Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net

uname -m returns IP25 what is SGI platform, it's about cache sizes and
internal net issues, I'm not sure that would work, I think it's more
reliable to do:
congrio 39% hinv -t cpu
CPU: MIPS R10000 Processor Chip Revision: 2.5
CPU: MIPS R10000 Processor Chip Revision: 2.5
CPU: MIPS R10000 Processor Chip Revision: 2.5
CPU: MIPS R10000 Processor Chip Revision: 2.5
CPU: MIPS R10000 Processor Chip Revision: 2.6
CPU: MIPS R10000 Processor Chip Revision: 2.6
CPU: MIPS R10000 Processor Chip Revision: 2.6
CPU: MIPS R10000 Processor Chip Revision: 2.6
or
congrio 40% hinv -t fpu
FPU: MIPS R10010 Floating Point Chip Revision: 2.5
FPU: MIPS R10010 Floating Point Chip Revision: 2.5
FPU: MIPS R10010 Floating Point Chip Revision: 2.5
FPU: MIPS R10010 Floating Point Chip Revision: 2.5
FPU: MIPS R10010 Floating Point Chip Revision: 2.6
FPU: MIPS R10010 Floating Point Chip Revision: 2.6
FPU: MIPS R10010 Floating Point Chip Revision: 2.6
FPU: MIPS R10010 Floating Point Chip Revision: 2.6
as you wish
best regards

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Henshall, Stuart - WCP 2001-12-03 10:05:06 FW: [CYGWIN] 7.2b3 postmaster doesn't start on Win98
Previous Message DaVinci 2001-12-03 08:33:25 Re: Problem (bug?) wih like