From: | Barry Lind <barry(at)xythos(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Performance problem with large insert statements |
Date: | 2001-11-29 06:19:13 |
Message-ID: | 3C05D361.8030009@xythos.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
In looking at some performance issues (I was trying to look at the
overhead of toast) I found that large insert statements were very slow.
My test case involved reading a file (6M file in my tests) and inserting
it into the database into a "largeobject" like table defined as follows:
create table tblob1 (filename text, lastbyte integer, data bytea);
The first test program read the file 8000 bytes at a time and inserted
them into the above table until the entire file was inserted. This test
program used a regular insert statement to do the inserting: (insert
into tblob1 values (?,?,?))
For three runs of this test the average time to insert the 6M file into
the database in 8000 byte rows (which ended up being 801 rows inserted
into the table) was: 17.803 seconds
The second test read the file in 8000 byte chucks just like the first
program but it used a function to do the insert and called the function
via the FastPath API. The function was:
CREATE FUNCTION BYTEA_WRITE (TEXT, INTEGER, BYTEA) RETURNS INTEGER
as '
BEGIN
INSERT INTO TBLOB1 VALUES ($1, $2, $3);
RETURN 1;
END;'
language 'plpgsql'
For three runs of this test the average time to insert the 6M file into
the database in 8000 byte parts was: 2.645
Thus using the insert statement was almost an order of magnitude slower
that using the function (17.803 sec vs. 2.645 sec).
Reading the data back from the server via a standard select statement
takes on average: 1.674 seconds.
I tried to run gprof to see where the time was going, but for some
reason the gprof output on my gmon.out file doesn't have any timing
information (all times are reported as 0.0) and I haven't been able to
figure out why yet. So I don't know what is taking up the bulk of the
time (I suspect it is either the decoding of the bytea data which the
Fastpath function call avoids, or the parser which needs to parse 801 8K
SQL statements vs. the function which has to parse one 100 byte statement.)
I have attached the two test programs (they are in java and use jdbc)
and a SQL script that creates the table and function.
thanks,
--Barry
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
BlobTestInsert.java | text/plain | 3.2 KB |
BlobTestFunction.java | text/plain | 4.1 KB |
create.sql | text/plain | 294 bytes |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-11-29 06:27:26 | Re: 7.2b3 pg_dump, general 7.2b3 comments |
Previous Message | Joe Conway | 2001-11-29 06:17:50 | Re: 7.2b3 pg_dump, general 7.2b3 comments |