From: | Barry Lind <barry(at)xythos(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Cc: | stuart(at)zapata(dot)org |
Subject: | insert/update/delete statements returning a query response |
Date: | 2001-11-26 21:01:37 |
Message-ID: | 3C02ADB1.5090000@xythos.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc |
Is this behavior intended in the backend? The problem is that when you
create a rule on an object that calls a stored function and invoke that
rule on an insert/update/delete statement your insert/update/delete
statement will now return a query result to the front end over the FE/BE
protocol. (I am not sure this is the exact senerio, but something
similar). This means that the user now needs to perform a
executeQuery() call when using these insert/update/delete statements in
JDBC because the JDBC driver isn't able to accept a query response when
issuing a insert/update/delete call.
thanks,
--Barry
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: CallableStatements
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 12:14:32 -0800 (PST)
From: Stuart Robinson <stuart(at)zapata(dot)org>
To: Rene Pijlman <rene(at)lab(dot)applinet(dot)nl>
CC: <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
There are various circumstances where you might want to call a stored
procedure with an executeUpdate method. For example, let's suppose you
have a view that combines a couple of tables and you want an application
you're building to be able to write to it. Since views are read-only, you
would create a rule that intercepts the inserts and updates and fires off
a stored procedure instead. Since the application is doing an insert or an
update, it will use executeUpdate, but the stored procedure will have to
use select and return a result, causing the application to error out.
-Stuart
On Mon, 26 Nov 2001, Rene Pijlman wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Nov 2001 10:40:52 -0800 (PST), you wrote:
> >But if you use the executeUpdate method, you'll get an error, because it
> >isn't expecting a result, no? So, how do you call a stored procedure
using
> >executeUpdate?
>
> You don't. In the current implementation you need to use a
> SELECT statement. Why is that a problem?
>
> Regards,
> René Pijlman <rene(at)lab(dot)applinet(dot)nl>
>
--
Stuart Robinson [stuart(at)zapata(dot)org]
http://www.nerdindustries.com
http://www.tzeltal.org
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-11-26 21:45:41 | DEBUG lines in server log |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-11-26 20:22:55 | Re: Minor buglet in update...from (I think) |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Nate Gelbard | 2001-11-26 21:02:53 | Re: JDBC bug? |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-11-26 20:53:56 | Re: JDBC bug? |