Re: bytea/ODBC/MSAccess issue

From: Joe Conway <joseph(dot)conway(at)home(dot)com>
To: Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: bytea/ODBC/MSAccess issue
Date: 2001-11-26 07:19:54
Message-ID: 3C01ED1A.4070101@home.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hiroshi Inoue wrote:

>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Tom Lane
>>
>>Joe Conway <joseph(dot)conway(at)home(dot)com> writes:
>>
>>>When creating a linked table in MS Access, bytea columns get mapped to
>>>"OLE Object" as a datatype, and this type is not able to be indexed.
>>>
>>Could we make our ODBC driver map bytea to some datatype that Access
>>doesn't choke on?
>>
>
> IIRC our ODBC driver maps bytea to SQL_VARBINARY which is
> able to be indexed in MS Access. Probably Joe is changing the
> *Max Varchar* option > 255.
> Currently the mapping of our driver is
> SQL_VARBINARY (the length <= 255) <---> bytea
> SQL_LONGVARBINARY (the length can be > 255) <---> lo
> .
> MS Access couldn't handle the binary type index > 255 bytes.
> PostgreSQL hasn't been able to have indexes on bytea until
> quite recently and bytea is unavailable for LO.
> Every application has its limitation.
>
> regards,
> Hiroshi Inoue

Thanks for the reply, Hiroshi. This advice worked, and after a little
research I see (as you said) that the limitation is with MS Access -- so
not much we can do :(

Joe

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hannu Krosing 2001-11-26 07:50:40 Re: OCTET_LENGTH is wrong
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2001-11-26 02:39:01 Re: Call for objections: deprecate postmaster -o switch?