From: | Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> |
---|---|
To: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, Eric Cholet <cholet(at)logilune(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Determining which index to create |
Date: | 2001-11-22 02:00:09 |
Message-ID: | 3BFC5C29.8C52C9B7@tpf.co.jp |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 21, 2001 at 04:09:52PM +0100, Eric Cholet wrote:
> > => explain select * from dico_frs where motid=4742 order by date desc limit
> > 10;
> > NOTICE: QUERY PLAN:
> >
> > Limit (cost=46172.25..46172.25 rows=10 width=16)
> > -> Sort (cost=46172.25..46172.25 rows=11382 width=16)
> > -> Index Scan using dico_frs_motid_date on dico_frs
> > (cost=0.00..45405.39 rows=11382 width=16)
>
> That's wrong. It doesn't seem to realise that a reverse scan on the index
> would give the right answer. Note that that's only true because you're
> selecting only a single motid. If there were multiple, a reverse scan would
> definitly not be appropriate.
Please try
select * from dico_frs where motid=4742 order by motid desc,
date desc limit 10;
regards,
Hiroshi Inoue
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-11-22 02:08:16 | Re: backup: pg_dumpall and full backups in general |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2001-11-22 01:40:46 | Re: TOAST performance (was Re: [GENERAL] Delete Performance) |