| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>,Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Reduce ProcArrayLock contention |
| Date: | 2015-06-29 17:11:04 |
| Message-ID: | 3BEE0AE4-26E8-43A7-A21F-364C9206F7A9@anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On June 29, 2015 7:02:10 PM GMT+02:00, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>On 29 June 2015 at 16:27, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>
>> Thanks to Robert Haas for having discussion (offlist) about the idea
>> and suggestions to improve it and also Andres Freund for having
>> discussion and sharing thoughts about this idea at PGCon.
>>
>
>Weird. This patch is implemented exactly the way I said to implement it
>publicly at PgCon.
>
>Was nobody recording the discussion at the unconference??
Amit presented an earlier version of this at the in unconference?
---
Please excuse brevity and formatting - I am writing this on my mobile phone.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2015-06-29 17:22:02 | Re: Reduce ProcArrayLock contention |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2015-06-29 17:02:10 | Re: Reduce ProcArrayLock contention |