From: | Mike Mascari <mascarm(at)mascari(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Off-Topic: Accounting question |
Date: | 2001-11-03 03:31:05 |
Message-ID: | 3BE364F9.4F3CF7A7@mascari.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Hello.
I have a quick accounting question. In the evaluation of Cost of
Goods Sold, one can use 3 different methods for evaluating
inventory: LIFO, FIFO, or Average Warehouse cost. In an application
which allows the user to adjust inventory quantities, if the user
discovers that the physical inventory in a cycle count is less than
the electronic accounts, its easy to attribute the missing inventory
as shrinkage. But what if the user discovers an on-hand quantity
that is greater than the electronic accounts? For example:
Jan 01, 2001 - Bought 1 Pencil for $3.00
Jan 03, 2001 - Bought 1 Pencil for $3.50
Jan 21, 2001 - Bought 1 Pencil for $4.50
Total:
3 Pencils
$11.00
However, when the cycle count is performed on Jan 31, 2001, 2 more
pencils are discovered. What do Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles say regarding the value of the 4th and 5th pencils? If a
sale of a pencil occurs on Feb 01, 2001, using LIFO, what is the
COGS?
Oliver?
Sorry for the off-topic question. Any pointers would be greatly
appreciated.
Mike Mascari
mascarm(at)mascari(dot)com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Aasmund Midttun Godal | 2001-11-03 04:01:58 | Re: Off-Topic: Accounting question |
Previous Message | JStanczak | 2001-11-02 21:18:42 | Problem starting as service. FIXED |