Re: Ant installation (and other) issues!

From: Barry Lind <barry(at)xythos(dot)com>
To: Rene Pijlman <rene(at)lab(dot)applinet(dot)nl>
Cc: pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Ant installation (and other) issues!
Date: 2001-10-27 15:52:22
Message-ID: 3BDAD836.6040705@xythos.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

Because many developers of postgres work over dialup modems at speeds of
32k. 500KB over a 32Kb line is a problem. Especially if you aren't
even planning on using jdbc, you still pay the price when doing a CVS
checkout.

--Barry

Rene Pijlman wrote:

> On Mon, 22 Oct 2001 19:22:19 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>
>>500k of binaries? You just lost the argument. That's not an acceptable
>>amount of overhead to add to the Postgres distribution.
>>
>
> Why? 500K can easily fit on a floppy, and that's technology from
> the 1980's.
>
> Regards,
> René Pijlman <rene(at)lab(dot)applinet(dot)nl>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Shin-Chang Huang 2001-10-27 20:23:59 Question!!
Previous Message Robert Dyas 2001-10-27 15:32:20 Re: JDBC executeUpdate() does not return the number of rows effected