From: | Barry Lind <barry(at)xythos(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Rene Pijlman <rene(at)lab(dot)applinet(dot)nl> |
Cc: | pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Ant installation (and other) issues! |
Date: | 2001-10-27 15:52:22 |
Message-ID: | 3BDAD836.6040705@xythos.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
Because many developers of postgres work over dialup modems at speeds of
32k. 500KB over a 32Kb line is a problem. Especially if you aren't
even planning on using jdbc, you still pay the price when doing a CVS
checkout.
--Barry
Rene Pijlman wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Oct 2001 19:22:19 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>
>>500k of binaries? You just lost the argument. That's not an acceptable
>>amount of overhead to add to the Postgres distribution.
>>
>
> Why? 500K can easily fit on a floppy, and that's technology from
> the 1980's.
>
> Regards,
> René Pijlman <rene(at)lab(dot)applinet(dot)nl>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Shin-Chang Huang | 2001-10-27 20:23:59 | Question!! |
Previous Message | Robert Dyas | 2001-10-27 15:32:20 | Re: JDBC executeUpdate() does not return the number of rows effected |