From: | mlw <markw(at)mohawksoft(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Doug McNaught <doug(at)wireboard(dot)com> |
Cc: | Reiner Dassing <dassing(at)wettzell(dot)ifag(dot)de>, pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Index of a table is not used (in any case) |
Date: | 2001-10-23 14:40:00 |
Message-ID: | 3BD58140.F7DF625C@mohawksoft.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-sql |
Doug McNaught wrote:
> Reiner Dassing <dassing(at)wettzell(dot)ifag(dot)de> writes:
>
> > Hello PostgreSQl Users!
> >
> > PostSQL V 7.1.1:
> >
> > I have defined a table and the necessary indices.
> > But the index is not used in every SELECT. (Therefore, the selects are
> > *very* slow, due to seq scan on
> > 20 million entries, which is a test setup up to now)
>
> Perennial first question: did you VACUUM ANALYZE?
Can there, or could there, be a notion of "rule based" optimization of
queries in PostgreSQL? The "not using index" problem is probably the most
common and most misunderstood problem.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jean-Michel POURE | 2001-10-23 15:16:06 | CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW/TRIGGER |
Previous Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2001-10-23 13:52:18 | Re: [GENERAL] To Postgres Devs : Wouldn't changing the |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Troy | 2001-10-23 15:03:05 | Re: Diferent databases on same query... |
Previous Message | Haller Christoph | 2001-10-23 14:10:35 | Re: pgsql embedded again! |