Re: [GENERAL] To Postgres Devs : Wouldn't changing the

From: Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Hackers List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] To Postgres Devs : Wouldn't changing the
Date: 2001-10-23 02:03:24
Message-ID: 3BD4CFEC.837574FF@tpf.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > > I don't think that enough votes are needed to reverse
> > > the change. You broke the discussion first rule.
>
> Are you subscribed to general? We had a big discussion there and there

I know the discussion and I've thought Peter's objection was
suffienctly valid to reverse your change but the discussion
has continued.

regards,
Hiroshi Inoue

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephan Szabo 2001-10-23 02:12:40 Re: Referential Integrity Violation not triggered
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2001-10-23 01:55:47 Re: [GENERAL] To Postgres Devs : Wouldn't changing the selectlimit

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2001-10-23 02:09:33 Re: Creating unique constraints on OID
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2001-10-23 01:55:47 Re: [GENERAL] To Postgres Devs : Wouldn't changing the selectlimit