| From: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Hackers List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] To Postgres Devs : Wouldn't changing the |
| Date: | 2001-10-23 01:47:50 |
| Message-ID: | 3BD4CC46.99A1B951@fourpalms.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
...
> Are you subscribed to general?
...
> Everyone thought LIMIT # OFFSET # was preferred.
I think Hiroshi's point is the same as mine: discussions of feature
changes need to happen on -hackers before being implemented.
Subscriptions to other mailing lists should not be required to stay up
with mainstream development issues.
I'm recently subscribed to -general, to allow me to respond to email
threads, but it has a lot of traffic and I may not stay subscribed for
long...
- Thomas
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Steven Vajdic | 2001-10-23 01:50:55 | Postgres 7.1.3. installation on Windows platforms |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-10-23 01:40:08 | Re: [GENERAL] To Postgres Devs : Wouldn't changing the selectlimit |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Steven Vajdic | 2001-10-23 01:50:55 | Postgres 7.1.3. installation on Windows platforms |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-10-23 01:40:08 | Re: [GENERAL] To Postgres Devs : Wouldn't changing the selectlimit |