Re: timestamp resolution?

From: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, thomas(at)pgsql(dot)com, Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: timestamp resolution?
Date: 2001-10-04 20:22:48
Message-ID: 3BBCC518.BBB215F6@fourpalms.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

...
> Hmm. Somewhere else it *does* specify a precision of zero for TIME and
> TIMESTAMP; wonder why that rule wouldn't apply to CURRENT_TIME etc too?
> Not that lots of precision isn't good, but I'd like to be consistant.

Ah, I'd forgotten about the 6 vs 0 behaviors (but had them in the code
just a couple of days ago ;)

- Thomas

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Lockhart 2001-10-04 20:30:24 Re: Unhappiness with forced precision conversion for timestamp
Previous Message Thomas Lockhart 2001-10-04 20:19:53 Re: Beta time