From: | Barry Lind <barry(at)xythos(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tanesh Sehgal <s_tanesh(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: jdbc2.0 compliance |
Date: | 2001-10-02 20:56:50 |
Message-ID: | 3BBA2A12.7050708@xythos.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
This jar is a jdbc2.0 jar. However, It isn't fully complient with the
jdbc2.0 spec. You will see much better complience if you upgrade to
7.1. But even in the forthcomming 7.2, there are some areas where the
driver still isn't fully complient. But it is getting better all of the
time. Is there some particular jdbc2.0 feature you are interested in?
thanks,
--Barry
Tanesh Sehgal wrote:
> Dear sir/madam
>
> I am using jdbc6.5-1.2.jar is it jdbc2.0 compliant if not Which version
> of jdbc postgresqldriver is jdbc2.0 compliance.
>
> regards
>
> Tanesh
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *Do You Yahoo!?*
> Listen to your Yahoo! Mail messages from any phone with Yahoo! by Phone
> <http://rd.yahoo.com/mail_us/tag/?http://phone.yahoo.com/?.refer=mailinsideymail>.
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Harkness | 2001-10-02 21:09:27 | Re: LOCK TABLE oddness in PLpgSQL function called via JDBC |
Previous Message | Barry Lind | 2001-10-02 20:54:06 | Re: are \r \n and \t legal in |