Re: bad style for SECURITY DEFINER

From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
To: "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: bad style for SECURITY DEFINER
Date: 2021-12-14 09:27:51
Message-ID: 3BBA1EE5-BDC7-44D5-9062-2E1CFDEB1DFC@yesql.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs pgsql-www

> On 13 Dec 2021, at 23:14, Jonathan S. Katz <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
>
> On 12/13/21 4:43 PM, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>
>> The margin issue looks right but I think the font-size should match the rest of
>> the title.
>
> Please see attached and below for revision.

I think this looks much better, and it matches how the PDF's are rendered.

> I'm not thrilled about the !important override that's needed to deal with another !important, but I don't want to try to unweave the !important nest given the lack of overall cases of a code block nested within h2 title tags.

Agreed on both counts.

--
Daniel Gustafsson https://vmware.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jonathan S. Katz 2021-12-14 19:07:54 Re: bad style for SECURITY DEFINER
Previous Message Jonathan S. Katz 2021-12-13 22:14:01 Re: bad style for SECURITY DEFINER

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jonathan S. Katz 2021-12-14 19:07:54 Re: bad style for SECURITY DEFINER
Previous Message Jonathan S. Katz 2021-12-13 22:14:01 Re: bad style for SECURITY DEFINER