From: | Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> |
---|---|
To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
Cc: | pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org, "'pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [ODBC] New driver options in 7.01.0007 |
Date: | 2001-09-24 08:18:20 |
Message-ID: | 3BAEEC4C.42B37087@tpf.co.jp |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-hackers pgsql-odbc |
Dave Page wrote:
> > > What?? OIDs optional?? That will *seriously* break pgAdmin at first
> > > thought. If anyone can give more info on this it would be
> > appreciated
> > > as I can't seem to get to the list archives at the moment.
> >
> > The following system tables don't have OIDs.
> >
> > relname | relhasoids
> > ----------------+------------
> > pg_attribute | f
> > pg_group | f
> > pg_inherits | f
> > pg_index | f
> > pg_amop | f
> > pg_amproc | f
> > pg_largeobject | f
> > pg_listener | f
> > pg_shadow | f
> > pg_attrdef | f
> > pg_description | f
> > pg_relcheck | f
> > pg_statistic | f
>
> Thanks Hiroshi. That's less of a problem than I first imagined, but it will
> probably still break pgAdmin completely.
>
> I assume there's a good reason for removing them?
PostgreSQL doesn't need/use their OIDs internally.
For example (attrelid, attnum) identifies the tuple
in pg_attribute properly. In addition they have
no index on thier OIDs and so the access to the
table via the OIDs aren't effective if the tables
are pretty large.
regards,
Hiroshi Inoue
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Gowey, Geoffrey | 2001-09-24 14:53:02 | Re: Changing data types |
Previous Message | Dave Page | 2001-09-24 07:53:06 | Re: [ODBC] New driver options in 7.01.0007 |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jean-Michel POURE | 2001-09-24 08:53:31 | Re: [HACKERS] UTF-8 support |
Previous Message | Dave Page | 2001-09-24 07:53:06 | Re: [ODBC] New driver options in 7.01.0007 |