Chris wrote:
>
> Could the parser do a different regex for the word user depending on
> syntax?
>
> Just throwing around some (probably stupid) ideas, I have no idea on how
> difficult / worthwhile this would actually be.
Difficult? No idea. Worthwile? Not at all I think, since both SQL92 and
SQL99 say that 'user' is a reserved word, so even if PostgreSQL coul
allow the use of user it shouldn't ;)
Jochem