From: | Barry Lind <barry(at)xythos(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL jdbc list <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Using boolean '1' in jdbc2 |
Date: | 2001-09-13 18:45:49 |
Message-ID: | 3BA0FEDD.4030704@xythos.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
Bruce,
This patch is fine.
thanks,
--Barry
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I noticed that jdbc1 getBoolean allows '1', while jdbc2 does not. The
> following patch makes jdbc2 accept '1' also. Is this OK?
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Index: src/interfaces/jdbc/org/postgresql/jdbc2/ResultSet.java
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /home/projects/pgsql/cvsroot/pgsql/src/interfaces/jdbc/org/postgresql/jdbc2/ResultSet.java,v
> retrieving revision 1.33
> diff -c -r1.33 ResultSet.java
> *** src/interfaces/jdbc/org/postgresql/jdbc2/ResultSet.java 2001/09/10 15:07:05 1.33
> --- src/interfaces/jdbc/org/postgresql/jdbc2/ResultSet.java 2001/09/13 16:43:51
> ***************
> *** 1396,1402 ****
> if (s != null)
> {
> int c = s.charAt(0);
> ! return ((c == 't') || (c == 'T'));
> }
> return false; // SQL NULL
> }
> --- 1396,1402 ----
> if (s != null)
> {
> int c = s.charAt(0);
> ! return ((c == 't') || (c == 'T') || (c == '1'));
> }
> return false; // SQL NULL
> }
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
>
> /bjm/diff
>
> Content-Type:
>
> text/plain
> Content-Encoding:
>
> 7bit
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Part 1.3
>
> Content-Type:
>
> text/plain
> Content-Encoding:
>
> binary
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Barry Lind | 2001-09-13 18:50:56 | Re: Transaction size limit & Data Truncation |
Previous Message | Glenn R. Kronschnabl | 2001-09-13 17:17:24 | [Fwd: Re: A Bug Fix - Is this a real bug? Has this already been fixed?] |