Re: jdbc driver vis Release 10

From: Rob Sargent <robjsargent(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: jdbc driver vis Release 10
Date: 2017-08-26 01:34:25
Message-ID: 3B9A573D-BE85-48BA-B9BD-F13E3F888A3F@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

> On Aug 25, 2017, at 5:55 PM, Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> wrote:
>
> There are newer versions out there!
>
> Dave Cramer
>
> davec(at)postgresintl(dot)com
> www.postgresintl.com
>
>> On 25 August 2017 at 19:53, Rob Sargent <robjsargent(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On 08/25/2017 05:34 PM, Dave Cramer wrote:
>>> The JDBC driver release is divorced from the server release.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> Dave Cramer
>>>
>>> davec(at)postgresintl(dot)com
>>> www.postgresintl.com
>>>
>>>> On 23 August 2017 at 19:33, Rob Sargent <robjsargent(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>>> I see no mention of a new jdbc driver on the release notes for Beta 1. Does that mean there isn't one?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org)
>>>> To make changes to your subscription:
>>>> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
>>>
>> Yes, so I've learned. I just ran my software using jdbc 9.4.1212 via j00Q 3.9 against pg10-beta3 without a problem. I do very vanilla stuff.
>>
>
Yes. I'll get there as needed but wanted to know if any piece needed changing NOW

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2017-08-26 04:40:53 Re: Extension coverage
Previous Message Zhu, Joshua 2017-08-26 00:28:07 Re: BDR replication port