Re: New RPMS ?

From: Fernando Lozano <fsl(at)centroin(dot)com(dot)br>
To: Trond Eivind Glomsrød <teg(at)redhat(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: New RPMS ?
Date: 2001-08-20 21:29:07
Message-ID: 3B818123.F68AE8ED@centroin.com.br
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Hi Trond,

> > Are there plans for 7.1.3 RPMS for Red Hat 6.2 and other systems using
> > the older glibc and rpm format?
>
> FWIW, while a version for RHL 6.2 makes sense because of glibc issues
> (and other libraries), the supported rpm format for RHL 6.2 is v4.
> Erratas (you have applied those, right? ;) also come in that format.

I have not aplied those. I don't know what I did wrong, but I broke two
systems (had to reinstall) when trying to update the rpm subsystem. But
that's my fault, I'll solve this eventually.

I'd like to have updated rpms for 6.2 for a number of packages and I
wonder if Red Hat or someone else will provide these or not. I am not
talking just about PostgreSQL now. It is not nice to provide support for
a number of customers without Unix and Linux culture and having to
recompile everything from sources. :-(

[]s, Fernando Lozano

In response to

  • Re: New RPMS ? at 2001-08-20 03:57:35 from Trond Eivind =?iso-8859-1?q?Glomsr=F8d?=

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Gould 2001-08-20 21:40:40 System tables showing in result from '\d'
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2001-08-20 21:08:54 Re: Finding database names for overnight vacuum