From: | Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Ivan Babikov <iab(at)qms(dot)e-burg(dot)ru> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Is it possible to work with big databases (up to 10Gb) under Postgres? |
Date: | 2001-08-20 18:19:21 |
Message-ID: | 3B8154A9.4881E748@postgresql.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Hi Ivan,
I was running a database with ~27GB of info (admittedly in large, very
simple tables) on PostgreSQL 7.0.3 a while ago for a few months.
Didn't have any real problems with it, apart from having to accept that
a lot of data takes time to process. :-/
Regards and best wishes,
Justin Clift
Ivan Babikov wrote:
>
> Hello All!
>
> Maybe this is one of those typical questions, but I have heard people
> complaining that Postgres is just for quite small bases, less than 2Gb.
>
> Now, we have to choose a free database engine for an inexpensive branch of
> our project and Interbase looks better in sense of capability to work with
> quite big bases (up to 10-20Gb). I am not sure that Postgres will work fine
> with databases greater than 10Gb. What does All think of it?
>
> Thanks in advance, Ivan Babikoff.
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
--
"My grandfather once told me that there are two kinds of people: those
who work and those who take the credit. He told me to try to be in the
first group; there was less competition there."
- Indira Gandhi
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Lamar Owen | 2001-08-20 18:22:42 | Re: New RPMS ? |
Previous Message | Trond Eivind =?iso-8859-1?q?Glomsr=F8d?= | 2001-08-20 18:18:50 | Re: Problems with installation v 7.1.2 |