| From: | Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Perfomance decreasing |
| Date: | 2001-08-17 04:52:01 |
| Message-ID: | 3B7CA2F1.5266FDF3@tpf.co.jp |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
> >> I'd say you shouldn't release it at all.
>
> > As far as I see I'm not releasing it.
>
> Oh, I hadn't looked closely at reindex_index. Hmm... okay, you are
> holding the lock acquired there.
Yes reindex_index is guarding itself.
> But you're still acquiring it way too
> late for my taste. All of the setup work in reindex_relation seems to
> be done without any lock.
OK I would add a heap_open() to reindex_relation.
Please wait a while. I've not reorganized my local
source yet.
regards,
Hiroshi Inoue
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2001-08-17 05:17:05 | Re: Max number of tables in a db? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2001-08-17 04:28:02 | Re: Perfomance decreasing |