Re: Fix for fetchone() and fetchmany() in Python interface

From: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Fernando Nasser <fnasser(at)cygnus(dot)com>, gerhard(at)bigfoot(dot)de, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Fix for fetchone() and fetchmany() in Python interface
Date: 2001-08-16 15:17:03
Message-ID: 3B7BE3EF.E40A3B3F@fourpalms.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

> My initial reaction was the same as yours: put it in current sources,
> but don't backpatch. But with both Fernando and Neil vouching for the
> correctness of the patch, I'm willing to assume it's okay.

I'll second that. (For me) the criteria for backpatching is that more
than one person is willing to *really* verify that the patch is Correct.

- Thomas

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-08-16 15:35:01 Re: Fix for fetchone() and fetchmany() in Python interface
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-08-16 14:52:05 Re: Re: Proposal for encrypting pg_shadow passwords