From: | Neil Padgett <npadgett(at)redhat(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)yahoo(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: int8 sequences --- small implementation problem |
Date: | 2001-08-14 17:12:26 |
Message-ID: | 3B795BFA.37EC642@redhat.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
[clip]
>
> This would work, I think, but my goodness it's an ugly solution.
> Has any hacker got a better one?
>
> regards, tom lane
How about:
#ifdef INT64_IS_BUSTED
#define int64aligned(name) int32 name##_; int64 name
#else
#define int64aligned(name) int64 name
#endif
typedef struct FormData_pg_sequence
{
NameData sequence_name;
int64aligned(last_value);
int64aligned(increment_by);
int64aligned(max_value);
int64aligned(min_value);
int64aligned(cache_value);
int64aligned(log_cnt);
char is_cycled;
char is_called;
} FormData_pg_sequence;
Neil
--
Neil Padgett
Red Hat Canada Ltd. E-Mail: npadgett(at)redhat(dot)com
2323 Yonge Street, Suite #300,
Toronto, ON M4P 2C9
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Blasby | 2001-08-14 17:18:17 | Forcing GiST index to be used |
Previous Message | Serguei Mokhov | 2001-08-14 16:10:59 | Re: int8 sequences --- small implementation problem |