Re: Re: AW: Re: OID wraparound: summary and proposal

From: Neil Padgett <npadgett(at)redhat(dot)com>
To: mlw <markw(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>
Cc: Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at>, Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Re: AW: Re: OID wraparound: summary and proposal
Date: 2001-08-13 18:04:57
Message-ID: 3B7816C9.43BC2F63@redhat.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

mlw wrote:

> The way I see it there are 4 options for the OID:
[snip]
> (2) Allow the ability to have tables without OIDs. This is a source of
> debate.

I think Tom Lane has already committed some patches to allow for this.
So, I think you should be able to try this from the latest CVS. (Tom?)

Neil

--
Neil Padgett
Red Hat Canada Ltd. E-Mail: npadgett(at)redhat(dot)com
2323 Yonge Street, Suite #300,
Toronto, ON M4P 2C9

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Doug McNaught 2001-08-13 18:07:58 Re: Re: AW: Re: OID wraparound: summary and proposal
Previous Message Rene Pijlman 2001-08-13 18:01:24 Re: JDBC pg_description update needed for CVS tip