Re: An unfair comparision....

From: Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Tony Hoyt <gmtonyhoyt(at)yahoo(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: An unfair comparision....
Date: 2001-08-09 14:48:18
Message-ID: 3B72A2B2.F395A885@postgresql.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Hi Tony,

PostgreSQL is *very* stable. Individual backends can be killed off by
weird SQL queries that trigger a known bug (not very many, and always
being fixed), but that is very very rare, and nothing which 99.999% of
normal SQL queries will get even close to.

There are a few 3rd party replication products for Solaris. The most
developed one I'm aware of is PostgreSQL Replicator
(pgreplicator.sourceforge.net)

The speed issue is a matter of sizing the database & hardware correctly,
you'll probably want to speak to a Commercial Support company for this.

And for Solaris support, I'd also advise contacting one of the
Commercial Support companies :

PostgreSQL Inc.
www.pgsql.com

GreatBridge LLC
www.greatbridge.com

In Japan, then Software Research Associates :
osb.sra.co.jp

In Vienna, Cybertec Geschwinde &. Schvnig OEG
postgres.cybertec.at

Further details of commercial support can be found at the PostgreSQL
Commercial Support page :

http://www.ca.postgresql.org/users-lounge/commercial-support.html

Hope this is helpful.

Regards and best wishes,

Justin Clift

Tony Hoyt wrote:
>
> I'm curious how PostgreSQL compares to Oracle in terms
> of stability and speed. My company is looking into
> alternative database software for our product but we
> need to know if it's stable enough for our needs.
>
> Our current requirements list for a good Database
> software application are the following.
>
> 1. Stability - It can survive power outages.
> 2. Speed - We're only going to perform very basic
> read and write transactions. Some tables are rather
> large but over all, we need a at least 200 sql
> transactions per second.
> 3. Redudency - Can we have two physical systems with
> one database being updated by the master database
> automaticly in case of failure. This is above and
> beyond RAID.
> 4. Solaris Support - I'm already positive that
> PostgreSQL can run on Solaris, but how well is it
> supported?
>
> If someone can adaquitly answer those issues for me,
> I would be extreamly greatfull. Thank you.
>
> Tony
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger
> http://phonecard.yahoo.com/
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html

--
"My grandfather once told me that there are two kinds of people: those
who work and those who take the credit. He told me to try to be in the
first group; there was less competition there."
- Indira Gandhi

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2001-08-09 15:35:13 Re: Random strings
Previous Message Richard Huxton 2001-08-09 14:19:07 Re: create table autoincrement