From: | Michael Weaver <mweaver(at)corpusglobe(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | 'Stephan Szabo' <sszabo(at)megazone23(dot)bigpanda(dot)com>, Michael Weaver <mweaver(at)corpusglobe(dot)com> |
Cc: | "'pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "'pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [SQL] Passing arrays |
Date: | 2003-02-14 08:09:55 |
Message-ID: | 3B663B41B350D311AEEF00A0C9254563201A72@VISION1 |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-novice pgsql-sql |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stephan Szabo [mailto:sszabo(at)megazone23(dot)bigpanda(dot)com]
> Sent: Friday, 14 February 2003 12:58 PM
> To: Michael Weaver
> Cc: 'pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org'; 'pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org'
> Subject: Re: [SQL] Passing arrays
>
>
>
> On Fri, 14 Feb 2003, Michael Weaver wrote:
>
> > How do you get an array of elements to be passed to a
> stored proc such that
> > you can use the array in a SELECT statement in the WHERE clause
> > - e.g. WHERE field IN (array) etc...
>
> A straight WHERE field IN (array) doesn't work. That's attempting to
> compare the field directly to the array as a whole (which is
> why you get
> the particular error you do.
I've got around this limitation using strings, but I do find it suprising,
that Postgres handles arrays this way.
Searching an array in an WHERE IN clause would be a useful task. (namely for
passing arrays of values between stored functions)
Ok it could be confusing, but I think a number of other DBs employ it to
good effect.
I'll take a look at the array extension in contrib - it sounds useful.
Thanks.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Durst | 2003-02-14 08:57:59 | Re: Passing arrays |
Previous Message | Stephan Szabo | 2003-02-14 04:57:33 | Re: [SQL] Passing arrays |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tomasz Myrta | 2003-02-14 08:33:22 | Re: PL/PGSQL EDITOR |
Previous Message | Wei Weng | 2003-02-14 05:52:41 | Re: Extending Datatype |