From: | Mark Volpe <volpe(dot)mark(at)epa(dot)gov> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | Mark Volpe <volpe(dot)mark(at)epamail(dot)epa(dot)gov>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] Re: [PATCH] Re: Setuid functions |
Date: | 2001-07-19 16:40:13 |
Message-ID: | 3B570D6D.7F6E05E@epa.gov |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
OK, I finally got around to adding the superuser check to my patch. So I try
to test it and...
ERROR: Only users with Postgres superuser privilege are permitted to create a
function in the 'plpgsql' language.
D'oh! So, if this is the case, then the last patch should be fine after all.
Mark
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>
> If you mean "only allow a superuser do define functions using this
> mechanism", that could work. But it would probably make this feature a
> lot less attractive, because any setuid function would have to run with
> super powers.
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Howard Williams | 2001-07-19 17:08:31 | RELAX! - or more to the point, how do I temporarily relax a trigger/constraint? |
Previous Message | Mikheev, Vadim | 2001-07-19 15:54:24 | RE: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend) |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-07-19 17:08:52 | Re: [PATCHES] Re: [PATCH] Re: Setuid functions |
Previous Message | Anders Bengtsson | 2001-07-19 14:26:50 | Re: [PATCHES] Re: [PATCH] Cleanup of JDBC character encoding |