Re: Re: PG rules! (RULES being the word ;->)

From: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org>
To: Janning Vygen <vygen(at)planwerk6(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Re: PG rules! (RULES being the word ;->)
Date: 2001-07-18 14:36:33
Message-ID: 3B559EF1.45EBCEBA@fourpalms.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

> this way i have to implement my businees logic twice. inside the
> database and in the middleware. I dont think that this is very good.

Hmm. Sounds like you are writing both the DB and the app. So enforcing
*your* business rules in the DB is not so important to you because you
are trusting yourself to do the same in the app. But for cases where the
project outgrows one programmer, or where there are multiple apps
touching the *same* DB, isolating the business rules - into the one
place in common between these apps - becomes a more obvious choice.

- Thomas

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Janning Vygen 2001-07-18 15:00:51 Re: Re: PG rules! (RULES being the word ;->)
Previous Message Kapil Tilwani 2001-07-18 14:27:44 THIS IS NOT RELATED TO THE RDBMS BUT PLEEEEEEEEEEEEEASE