| From: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, Postgresql General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Hackers List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] [PATCH] To remove EXTEND INDEX |
| Date: | 2001-07-13 20:56:12 |
| Message-ID: | 3B4F606C.C1CEB06B@alumni.caltech.edu |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
> > > Note, this patch makes it as if it never existed. So, if you think some of
> > > the code may be useful, now is the time to speak up! :)
> > Shouldn't this conversation be happening on the -hackers list? TIA
> Actually, because it had a patch attached, it should go to patches,
> right?
imho, no. Because there needs to be a discussion about whether to remove
code from the tree, and whether that code may be useful for something
else.
-patches is designed to take actual patch files (to reduce bandwidth on
-hackers) but not to host planning discussions. If this had been a
simple patch without feature changes or other larger ramifications, then
it is more clearly a patch-only topic.
- Thomas
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-07-13 21:00:22 | Re: [PATCH] To remove EXTEND INDEX |
| Previous Message | Douglas Bates | 2001-07-13 20:18:23 | references constraint on inherited tables? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-07-13 21:00:22 | Re: [PATCH] To remove EXTEND INDEX |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-07-13 20:20:06 | Re: iconv? |