Re: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Re: Setuid functions

From: Mark Volpe <volpe(dot)mark(at)epa(dot)gov>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Mark Volpe <volpe(dot)mark(at)epamail(dot)epa(dot)gov>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Re: Setuid functions
Date: 2001-07-11 20:46:32
Message-ID: 3B4CBB28.889659C3@epa.gov
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

I'm going to say apply it, of course! But then, I'd just like to tell the boss
that my app is running on an unmodified PostgreSQL :-)

Mark

Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> I don't pretend to understand it. Just tell me what to do with the
> patch. :-)
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nathan Myers 2001-07-11 20:48:21 Re: Re: Encrypting pg_shadow passwords
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2001-07-11 20:34:39 Re: I can't keep up

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2001-07-11 21:12:00 Re: Re: [GENERAL] Bug in createlang?
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2001-07-11 20:33:37 Re: [GENERAL] Bug in createlang?