From: | Joseph Shraibman <jks(at)selectacast(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Doug McNaught <doug(at)wireboard(dot)com> |
Cc: | "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Re: Backups WAS: 2 gig file size limit |
Date: | 2001-07-10 00:59:59 |
Message-ID: | 3B4A538F.8C901C72@selectacast.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc pgsql-patches |
Doug McNaught wrote:
>
> [HACKERS removed from CC: list]
>
> Joseph Shraibman <jks(at)selectacast(dot)net> writes:
>
> > Doing a dumpall for a backup is taking a long time, the a restore from
> > the dump files doesn't leave the database in its original state. Could
> > a command be added that locks all the files, quickly tars them up, then
> > releases the lock?
>
> As I understand it, pg_dump runs inside a transaction, so the output
> reflects a consistent snapshot of the database as of the time the dump
> starts (thanks to MVCC); restoring will put the database back to where
> it was at the start of the dump.
>
In theory.
> Have you observed otherwise?
Yes. Specifically timestamps are dumped in a way that (1) they lose
percision (2) sometimes have 60 in the seconds field which prevents the
dump from being restored.
And I suspect any statistics generated by VACUUM ANALYZE are lost.
If a database got corrupted somehow in order to restore from the dump
the database would have to delete the original database then restore
from the dump. Untarring would be much easier (especially as the
database grows). Obviously this won't replace dumps but for quick
backups it would be great.
--
Joseph Shraibman
jks(at)selectacast(dot)net
Increase signal to noise ratio. http://www.targabot.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Barry Lind | 2001-07-10 01:21:54 | Re: Too much data received? |
Previous Message | Doug McNaught | 2001-07-10 00:51:47 | Re: Re: Backups WAS: 2 gig file size limit |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2001-07-10 01:39:11 | More ADD CONSTRAINT behaviour questions |
Previous Message | Doug McNaught | 2001-07-10 00:51:47 | Re: Re: Backups WAS: 2 gig file size limit |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Barry Lind | 2001-07-10 01:21:54 | Re: Too much data received? |
Previous Message | Doug McNaught | 2001-07-10 00:51:47 | Re: Re: Backups WAS: 2 gig file size limit |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joseph Shraibman | 2001-07-10 01:22:21 | Re: Patch to remove connection hook and JDK 1.3 dependencies |
Previous Message | Doug McNaught | 2001-07-10 00:51:47 | Re: Re: Backups WAS: 2 gig file size limit |