Re: ADO and ODBC: More

Tom Lane wrote:
>
> "NTB Technical Support" <techsupport(at)ntb(dot)org(dot)uk> writes:
> >> I'd write it off as broken code in ADO, and program around it by not
> >> using column names that require quoting. Ugly answer, but it's not
> >> clear that you have an alternative (short of waiting for an ADO fix).
>
> > I just don't fancy modifying all those hundreds of pages of
> > code... And it works with SQL Server, so that would have to be broken
> > in a compatible fashion!
>
> It does eh? Hmm, that suggests that there is *some* way to make the
> right thing happen. Anyone know how Microsoft's version of
> SQLColAttributes acts with such names?
>

ADO doesn't need ODBC essentially and M$ SQL Server has
its own OLE DB provider. PostgreSQL doesn't have its OLE
DB provider implementation yet and has to use M$ OLD DB
provider for ODBC.
I don't know why the table name is quoted but the column
names aren't. There are many applications which quote
column/table names properly(unconditionally?). So it seems
very hard to change SQLxxxx.
Another way is to implement driver cursors. Actually I plan
to implement static/keyset-driven cursors. However I'm not
sure I can do it and couldn't guarantee when it is ready.

regards,
Hiroshi Inoue