From: | Syd <569170(at)aliencamel(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: insert speed - Mac OSX vs Redhat |
Date: | 2004-01-15 21:17:32 |
Message-ID: | 3B34D6CC-47A0-11D8-BC83-00039398E788@aliencamel.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On 16/01/2004, at 2:44 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
...
> As noted elsewhere, it's highly likely that this has nothing to do with
> the OS, and everything to do with write caching in the disks being
> used.
>
> I assume you are benchmarking small individual transactions (one insert
> per xact). In such scenarios it's essentially impossible to commit
> more
> than one transaction per revolution of the WAL disk, because you have
> to
> write the same WAL disk page repeatedly and wait for it to get down to
> the platter. When you get results that are markedly in excess of the
> disk RPM figure, it's proof positive that the disk is lying about write
> complete (or that you don't have fsync on).
>
Tom, thanks for this explanation - we'll check this out straight away,
but it would explain a lot.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Anjan Dave | 2004-01-15 22:49:28 | shared_buffer value |
Previous Message | Evil Azrael | 2004-01-15 17:08:11 | Re: Trigger question |