Re: OID Wrap

From: mlw <markw(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: OID Wrap
Date: 2001-06-11 18:11:06
Message-ID: 3B2509BA.C81D394E@mohawksoft.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian wrote:

> > You guys said you've never seen it.
> > You said you wanted to know if anyone has ever run into it!
> >
> > Welcome to psql, the PostgreSQL interactive terminal.
> >
> > Type: \copyright for distribution terms
> > \h for help with SQL commands
> > \? for help on internal slash commands
> > \g or terminate with semicolon to execute query
> > \q to quit
>
> Very interesting. Also, it points out that we don't have OID as
> unsigned in all places. Are you running 7.1.X?

This system is currently 7.0.3, but we are working at moving it to 7.1.x
very soon.

The issue is that we backup the database, run update scripts. If the update
scripts fail, we drop the database and reload from backup (It is a very
interdependent amalgam of several vendor's databases). The database is well
over 50 million records and almost a hundred indexes, and we have been doing
this for a while. I have had it in the back of my mind that I should keep an
eye on this, but it bit me before I really focused. It isn't a big deal for
us, we just have to run initdb once in a while. lol.

But I thought you guys would like to know that it did happen!

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-06-11 18:13:45 Re: inet/cidr type comparisons
Previous Message Alex Pilosov 2001-06-11 18:06:01 Re: inet/cidr type comparisons