From: | Mark Stosberg <mark(at)summersault(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | behavior of ' = NULL' vs. MySQL vs. Standards |
Date: | 2001-06-07 01:00:45 |
Message-ID: | 3B1ED23A.984C3159@summersault.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-sql |
Hello,
I'm a long time Postgres user who uses MySQL when I have to. I recently
ran into an issue with MySQL where this construct didn't do what I expect:
WHERE date_column = NULL
I expected it to work like "date_column IS NULL" like it does it
Postgres 7.0.2, but instead it returned an empty result set.
After conversing with some folks on the MySQL list, it was mentioned that:
* "NULL is *NOT* a value. It's an absence of a value, and doing *any*
comparisons with NULL is invalid (the result must always be NULL, even
if you say "foo = NULL")."
* Postgres handling is non-standard (even if it's intuitive.)
My questions then are: 1.) What IS the standard for handling NULLs? and
then 2.) If Postgres handling is different than the standard, what's the
reason?
To me, having " = NULL" be the same as " IS NULL" is intuitive and thus
useful, but I also like appeal of using standards when possible. :)
Thanks!
-mark
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 2001-06-07 01:03:15 | Re: psql bug or feature? |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-06-07 00:08:03 | Re: Re: [HACKERS] Outstanding patches |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | John Scott | 2001-06-07 01:08:14 | Re: [SQL] maximum number of rows in table - what about oid limits? |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2001-06-06 23:12:06 | Re: How to create a *pass-through-query* in postgresql |