Re: WAL and backup recovery

From: Dario Brignardello <dbrignar(at)sinectis(dot)com>
To:
Cc: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: WAL and backup recovery
Date: 2001-05-23 17:54:34
Message-ID: 3B0BF95A.B7E41D39@sinectis.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

Thanks for your help, its working now :-).
Yours:
Dario Brignardello

Tom Lane wrote:

> Dario Brignardello <dbrignar(at)sinectis(dot)com> writes:
> > checkpoint_segments = 1
> > checkpoint_timeout = 30
>
> Reducing checkpoint_segments and checkpoint_timeout is actually
> seriously counterproductive, if your problem is amount of disk space
> chewed up by WAL logs during a long transaction (such as bulk load of
> a big table). The WAL log cannot be truncated until the xact commits,
> so the checkpoints that happen meanwhile just cause log bloat. Lots
> of it, because each checkpoint causes fresh copying of modified pages
> into the WAL log.
>
> Try increasing those numbers, not decreasing them. Maybe 10/600 or so?
>
> Also, if you are short on disk space for WAL, increasing wal_files isn't
> such a great idea either.
>
> regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-05-23 18:45:55 Re: Postgres 7.0.3 Dying
Previous Message Thalis A. Kalfigopoulos 2001-05-23 17:23:02 Re: WAL and backup recovery