From: | Dario Brignardello <dbrignar(at)sinectis(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | |
Cc: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: WAL and backup recovery |
Date: | 2001-05-23 17:54:34 |
Message-ID: | 3B0BF95A.B7E41D39@sinectis.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Thanks for your help, its working now :-).
Yours:
Dario Brignardello
Tom Lane wrote:
> Dario Brignardello <dbrignar(at)sinectis(dot)com> writes:
> > checkpoint_segments = 1
> > checkpoint_timeout = 30
>
> Reducing checkpoint_segments and checkpoint_timeout is actually
> seriously counterproductive, if your problem is amount of disk space
> chewed up by WAL logs during a long transaction (such as bulk load of
> a big table). The WAL log cannot be truncated until the xact commits,
> so the checkpoints that happen meanwhile just cause log bloat. Lots
> of it, because each checkpoint causes fresh copying of modified pages
> into the WAL log.
>
> Try increasing those numbers, not decreasing them. Maybe 10/600 or so?
>
> Also, if you are short on disk space for WAL, increasing wal_files isn't
> such a great idea either.
>
> regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-05-23 18:45:55 | Re: Postgres 7.0.3 Dying |
Previous Message | Thalis A. Kalfigopoulos | 2001-05-23 17:23:02 | Re: WAL and backup recovery |